“This paper presents a list of the top 20 articles published in the American Economic Review during its first 100 years. This list was assembled in honor of the AER‘s one-hundredth anniversary by a group of distinguished economists at the request of AER‘s editor. A brief description accompanies the citations of each article.”
“Written in celebration of the 100th anniversary of the American Economic Review, this paper recounts the history of the journal. The recounting has an analytic core that sees the American Economic Association as an organization supplying goods and services to its members, one of which is the Review. Early in its history the Review was a multipurpose publication with highly disparate content. Over time the economics profession expanded and more economics research was produced, primarily in the form of journal articles. Editors accommodated this shift by allocating more resources to the refereeing and editing process and more space to research papers.”
Took me a while to understand what you are talking about. And I still think it's irrelevant :-). Is it that you do not agree with this selection? Have alternative proposals? Etc.
I wish they told us which were the contentious 5<br />a Danish economist