Found out somewhat late about this, apparently it’s been out there (in its second edition!) for more than a month now. Anyway, prepare for a 1 h 21 min 43 s long video. Whether it is conspiracy theory materialized or something else (I don’t even what to think what something else this can be), we have to see. For now though I must say that I find it extremely well done (certainly better put together than Moore’s Fahrenheit 9/11, which lost documentary value because of its insistence on unverified facts, I would say).
3 thoughts on “Loosechange911”
Comments are closed.
Oops, the address cannot be read properly. Once more, enabled as a link link this time:<BR/><BR/><A HREF="http://911research.wtc7.net/reviews/loose_change/pentagon.html" REL="nofollow">http://911research.wtc7.net/reviews/loose_change/pentagon.html</A>
I found a web resource that goes line by line on the video with pros and cons to the conclusions of the authors. The pros, sometimes enhanced, are not so few!<BR/><BR/>http://911research.wtc7.net/reviews/loose_change/pentagon.html<BR/><BR/>All in all, although I am very far from supporting as yet the overall conclusions of loosechange911 second edition, there are some VERY INTERESTING questions
Here’s a wikipedia entry saying more about loosechange, including apparent factual inaccuracies:<BR/><BR/>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loose_Change_(video)