@ DK economist: Sure. You don't want anything like that in your CV, that would be negative signalling :-).
Let's see, I believe in Economics we have even worse stuff than "open source". Herr Professor could sent there :)<br />a Danish economist
Nicole: sure, why don't you join us? ๐
Glad to know that you researchers also have some fun ๐
The more I watch it the more my favourite is the part with "their impact factor sucks", and then one of the young ladies : "that is not true, they were well ranked last year" Ha hah hahhh haah hah hahh ah hahh haah! Vic
Vic, I confess: I AM the third referee all the time :-).
Man oh man!! I shall never ever again refuse to referee. I shall ask the editors to make me reviewer #3! Vic
๐
Sebs, this is HILLARIOUS!!! LOL. Let us all submit to open access journals ha ha.
Somebody stop me from laughing. Scientific American alternative to all rejections! should playe in the first class for any grad studs
Brilliant! <br />Tnx 4 posting!
@ DK economist: Sure. You don't want anything like that in your CV, that would be negative signalling :-).
Let's see, I believe in Economics we have even worse stuff than "open source". Herr Professor could sent there :)<br />a Danish economist
Nicole: sure, why don't you join us? ๐
Glad to know that you researchers also have some fun ๐
The more I watch it the more my favourite is the part with "their impact factor sucks", and then one of the young ladies : "that is not true, they were well ranked last year" Ha hah hahhh haah hah hahh ah hahh haah! Vic
Vic, I confess: I AM the third referee all the time :-).
Man oh man!! I shall never ever again refuse to referee. I shall ask the editors to make me reviewer #3! Vic
๐
Sebs, this is HILLARIOUS!!! LOL. Let us all submit to open access journals ha ha.
Somebody stop me from laughing. Scientific American alternative to all rejections! should playe in the first class for any grad studs